Skip to main content

RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Capacity Calculator

Calculate usable storage, parity loss, disk efficiency, and fault tolerance across RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 50, and 60 configurations.

Input Parameters

Try Example:
1128
0.11000
08

Calculation Results

Total Number of Disks
4 Disks
Capacity per Disk
2
Capacity Unit
TB
RAID Configuration Level
RAID5
Hot Spare Disks
0 Disks
Total Raw Capacity (Decimal)
8 TB
Total Raw Capacity (Binary)
7.28 TiB
Net Usable Capacity (Decimal)
6 TB
Net Usable Capacity (Binary)
5.46 TiB
Parity / Redundancy Capacity (TB)
2 TB
Parity / Redundancy Capacity (TiB)
1.82 TiB
Storage Space Efficiency
75 %
Disk Fault Tolerance
1 drive bersamaan
Estimated Read Performance Gain
3×
Estimated Write Performance Gain
1× (Parity write penalty)
Want to compare 2 design options side-by-side (e.g., Scenario A vs Scenario B)?
⚡ Server & Storage Hardware Advisory
HBA LSI 9300-8i / 9400-16i (IT-Mode Non-RAID) + ECC RAM
Enterprise CMR Drives / Datacenter NVMe (PLP Power-Loss Protection)

For Proxmox ZFS, always use IT-Mode HBA controllers instead of hardware RAID cards, paired with Pure Sinewave UPS.

2D Rack Elevation Builder

Visual 2D 19" Server Rack & Patch Panel Builder

24U Standing Close Rack 19" — 11U Used / 13U Airflow Free24U24U23U23U22U22U21U21U20U20U19U19U18U18U17U17U16U16U15U15U14U14U13U13U12U12U11U11U10U10U9U9U8U8U7U7U6U6U5U5U4U4U3U3U2U2U1U1U2U Online Sinewave Rackmount UPS2200 VA • Pure Sinewave • LCD2U2U External VRLA Battery Bank (EBM)65 Ah Deep-Cycle • Hot-Swappable2U2U ZFS / Hardware Storage Server (RAID5)8x 4 TB Hot-Swap Bays • Redundant PSU2U1U Proxmox VE Compute Hypervisor Node1U1U Horizontal Brush Cable Management Panel1U1U 24-Port Cat6 Shielded Patch Panel1U1U 24-Port Gigabit PoE+ / L3 Core Switch1U1U Rackmount Metered PDU (8x C13 Outlet)1U
Rack Capacity & Thermal Summary
Occupied U11U / 24U
Free Airflow13U Free
Estimated Total Rack Weight± 138 kg
Rack Mounting Best Practices
  • 1U–4U (Bottom): Heavy UPS & VRLA Battery Banks mounted at the bottom to lower center of gravity.
  • Middle: Compute servers, ZFS storage arrays, and NVRs placed in the center cold-aisle zone.
  • Top: Top-of-Rack PoE switches, Cat6 patch panels, and brush organizers for overhead cable trays.
Share to WhatsApp
ℹ️

Technical Accuracy Note: Calculation results are engineering estimates based on standard RFC/IEEE/ITU-T models. Actual field performance may vary due to protocol overhead, hardware specifications, and environmental factors.

🚀 Share Calculation Results or Embed on Your Site

Deep-link automatically preserves your current inputs — ideal for WhatsApp, Telegram, Reddit, or engineering docs.

How to Use This Tool

  1. Select your target RAID level (RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 6, RAID 10, RAID 50, or RAID 60).
  2. Enter the number of physical disk drives, individual disk capacity (TB or GB), and any dedicated Hot Spare drives.
  3. Review the net usable capacity in TB and TiB, storage efficiency percentage, parity overhead, and hardware fault tolerance limits.

Worked Example: Standard Server RAID 5 (4 × 2 TB)

Computed example: An array of 4 drives × 2 TB (8 TB / 7.28 TiB raw) in RAID5 provides 6 TB (5.46 TiB) net usable storage with 75% storage efficiency, 2 TB parity overhead, and 1 drive bersamaan fault tolerance.

Example Input
Total Physical Drives
4 Disks
Capacity per Drive
2
Capacity Unit
TB (Decimal Terabyte 10^12)
RAID Level
RAID 5 (Single Distributed Parity)
Dedicated Hot Spare Drives
0 Disks
Calculated Output
Total Number of Disks
4 Disks
Capacity per Disk
2
Capacity Unit
TB
RAID Configuration Level
RAID5
Hot Spare Disks
0 Disks
Total Raw Capacity (Decimal)
8 TB
Total Raw Capacity (Binary)
7.28 TiB
Net Usable Capacity (Decimal)
6 TB
Net Usable Capacity (Binary)
5.46 TiB
Parity / Redundancy Capacity (TB)
2 TB
Parity / Redundancy Capacity (TiB)
1.82 TiB
Storage Space Efficiency
75 %
Disk Fault Tolerance
1 drive bersamaan
Estimated Read Performance Gain
3×
Estimated Write Performance Gain
1× (Parity write penalty)

Core Concept & Engineering Notes

Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) aggregates multiple physical hard drives or solid-state drives into a single logical volume to deliver fault tolerance against hardware failures, improve read/write I/O performance, or achieve both concurrently. Sizing storage arrays and selecting the appropriate RAID level is a critical architecture milestone for systems administrators, directly dictating storage efficiency ratios, disk failure resilience, and I/O write penalties. RAID 0 (Striping) distributes data evenly across member disks without parity or mirroring, offering maximum throughput and 100% capacity utilization at the severe cost of zero fault tolerance—a single drive failure destroys the entire array. RAID 1 (Mirroring) creates duplicate copies across paired disks, delivering high read throughput and simple fault recovery at 50% storage efficiency. RAID 5 introduces distributed parity across three or more disks, withstanding a single drive loss while providing (N-1)/N capacity. With modern high-capacity drives (exceeding 4 TB), RAID 6 (Dual Parity) is strongly preferred over RAID 5 because its dual parity blocks safeguard against a catastrophic second disk failure during intensive, multi-hour rebuild operations. For I/O-intensive workloads such as transactional enterprise databases and virtual machine hypervisors, nested RAID 10 (Striping of Mirrors) provides optimal write throughput and fast rebuild times by eliminating parity calculation bottlenecks. This calculator evaluates gross raw capacity in decimal TB and binary TiB, net usable storage capacity, parity and spare disk consumption, overall storage efficiency percentages, and fault tolerance thresholds across all primary RAID topologies.

How It Was Calculated (Formulas & Steps)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Why is the hard drive capacity reported by the operating system smaller than the manufacturer label?

Drive manufacturers measure capacity using decimal SI units (1 TB = 10^12 bytes), whereas operating systems like Windows calculate storage in binary IEC units (1 TiB = 2^40 = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes). A physical 1 TB drive displays as approximately 0.91 TiB in system properties.

Why is RAID 5 discouraged for modern large-capacity drives (above 4 TB)?

When a failed drive is replaced, the rebuild process must read every sector across remaining drives over many hours or days. The statistical probability of encountering an Unrecoverable Read Error (URE) during this stressful rebuild is significant, causing complete RAID 5 array failure. RAID 6 or RAID 10 is strongly recommended.

When should I choose RAID 10 over RAID 6?

Choose RAID 10 for high-volume random write workloads (such as OLTP transactional databases and VM hypervisors) where you need fast rebuilds and zero parity calculation penalties. Choose RAID 6 for bulk storage, archiving, or video where cost per usable terabyte is the primary factor.

References & Notes

Last updated: Technically Verified · Industry Standard

Note: Results above are mathematical estimates based on standard formulas. Always verify against official vendor documentation and site conditions before production deployment.

🔗Related Scenarios & Companion Calculators

Browse All 30+ Scenarios →
🔬 Scientific Methodology & Normative Verification

Engineering Sensitivity Analysis, Response Curve & Technical Citation

✓ Calibrated to ISO/IEC/IEEE/TIA Clauses

1. 1. 3-Point Engineering Sensitivity & Tolerance Envelope

Comparative evaluation across theoretical laboratory bounds (0% loss), current nominal operating point, and conservative field safety bounds (±15% thermal/aging derating).

Evaluated Parameter Ideal Theoretical Bound Nominal Operating Point Conservative Safety Bound (±15%) Engineering Derating Rule
Total Number of Disks 3.6 4 4.6 Engineering Safety Margin (+15% Overhead)
Capacity per Disk 1.8 2 2.3 Engineering Safety Margin (+15% Overhead)
Total Raw Capacity (Decimal) 7.2 8 9.2 Engineering Safety Margin (+15% Overhead)
Total Raw Capacity (Binary) 6.55 7.28 8.37 Engineering Safety Margin (+15% Overhead)
Net Usable Capacity (Decimal) 6.48 6 5.1 Thermal & Aging Derating (-15% Worst-Case)

2. 2. Mathematical Function Curve & Operating Coordinate (x₀, y₀)

MATHEMATICAL RESPONSE CURVE: TOTAL NUMBER OF DISKS VS TOTAL NUMBER OF DISKS Conservative Engineering Bound (+15% Safety Margin) 1.6 2.4 3.2 4 4.8 5.6 6.4 (x₀=4, y₀=4) Variabel Independen (x): Total Number of Disks

3. 3. Physical Constants & Normative Standard Clauses

k_IEC(10¹²/2⁴⁰) = 0.9094947 TiB/TB ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008

Decimal Terabyte (SI) to Binary Tebibyte (IEC) Conversion Ratio

Clause 4 — Binary Prefixes — 1 TB = 10¹² Bytes; 1 TiB = 2⁴⁰ Bytes = 1,099,511,627,776 Bytes.

α_Cu(20°C) = 0.00393 °C⁻¹ IEC 60028

Temperature Coefficient of Resistance for Copper

International Annealed Copper Standard — Used in thermal derating equation: R(T) = R_20 × [1 + 0.00393 × (T - 20)].

4. 4. Independent Technical & Academic Citation (IEEE / APA 7th / BibTeX / LaTeX)

Use the standard citation formats below to reference this computational methodology in engineering specifications, audit reports, or academic papers.

Format IEEE & APA 7th Edition

[IEEE] KalkuNet Engineering Team, "RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Capacity Calculator — Standard Engineering Computational Instrument," KalkuNet Technical Suite, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://kalkunet.com/en/tools/raid-calculator. [Accessed: 2026-11-08].

[APA 7th] KalkuNet Engineering Team. (2026). RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Capacity Calculator (Production release 2026-11-08) [Engineering computational software]. KalkuNet. https://kalkunet.com/en/tools/raid-calculator

BibTeX & LaTeX Derivation Snippet
@software{kalkunet_raid_calculator_2026,
  author = {{KalkuNet Engineering Team}},
  title = {{RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Capacity Calculator --- KalkuNet Engineering Suite}},
  year = {2026},
  publisher = {KalkuNet.com},
  url = {https://kalkunet.com/en/tools/raid-calculator},
  urldate = {2026-11-08}
}

% LaTeX Engineering Derivation — Generated via https://kalkunet.com/en/tools/raid-calculator
\begin{equation}
  \text{Model: } RAID 0 Usable = N × Size (100% Efficiency)
\end{equation}
% Parameter Input Terukur: drives = 4, \; driveSize = 2, \; unit = TB, \; raidType = raid5
% Hasil Evaluasi Numerik : drives = \mathbf{4}, \; driveSize = \mathbf{2}, \; unit = \mathbf{TB}